40 Comments
User's avatar
Eric Fuleftists's avatar

Thanks for the thought-provoking article. It presents an extremely interesting hypothesis on who's instigating world events. I have some impressions of the hypothesis itself, not necessarily a critique...

The hypothesis' framework is that the two factions are solely materialistic. They want to rule the world, because they are motivated by worldly hate of everyone but themselves, and worldly love of its wealth, resources, and power thereof. But such materialistic motivations must deliberately refuse to recognize any spiritual forces and spiritual motivations. They are treated as fictions, and thus not part of the globalist equation.

For example, the morality that has infected the masses today, even Christianity, is purely materialistic. It loosely says that you should not harm anyone else, but whatever you do besides that is perfectly ok. This formulation has no room for traditional morality such as the seven deadly sins of pride, greed, lust, envy, gluttony, wrath, and sloth. Hey, all those are now ok, go ahead and revel in them, as long as you don't affect anyone else (therefore such things as fat-shaming are strictly immoral, and 'hate-speech' is believed to be an incontrovertible sin).

So here's an alternative hypothesis:

The faction or factions attempting to rule the world are motivated by spiritual forces, including spiritual entities who are able to infiltrate this world's material dimensions, and thereby set up the globalist forces we peons are allowed to see. The motivations of spiritual beings are beyond our understanding, although humanity has been given some hints by various religious documents generated throughout history, especially the Bible. Only the results of such motivations are easily recognized - power, control, hatred of humanity in general, versus another side that ostensibly loves humanity, with their "love" being undefinable and beyond human abilities to grasp other than fleeting impressions here on earth.

If my hypothesis is viable, then I predict that soon we'll be seeing the advent of governments around the world proclaiming aliens to be real and already interacting with humanity. There will be an enormous effort to subsume all world religions under the umbrella of "space brothers", and thereafter all such religions will be forcibly put down to be supplanted by the new, very materialistic world belief system. Of course, demons from other more hellish dimensions are easily misinterpreted as aliens, so this new religion fits right in with their spiritual plans.

Is my hypothesis outré? Is Satan really living in a chateau in the south of France? Enquiring minds want to know. Stay tuned, the answers may or may not be coming to a theater near you.

Gaius Baltar's avatar

I included the spiritual motivations in part one but mainly attributed them to the Zionist-Neocon faction. The other faction is mostly atheist and materialistic and are mostly motivated by their personality. Regarding your theory though, I wouldn’t dismiss it.

Liisa Tikka's avatar

My ideas, too. Materialism is the product of hostile spiritual forces aiming to corrupt and destroy human soul.

Luke's avatar

Excellent work sir. I hope your health improves. I believe both parts of your essay give us the best understanding of the enemy humanity must deal with. It makes sense.

I got to thinking when Trump announced his 2024 bid if he would be brought back to deal with Russia, China, Iran, etc. Everything up to that point had been botched and time was of the essence. It certainly looks like that is exactly what happened.

Things are getting crazy nonetheless. I am very concerned with the situation in Iran heating back up and energy infrastructure being obliterated. That would almost seem to me as move to destroy the world if they cannot have it for themselves. I have been very concerned about this. If it happens it will be time for me to go full DEFCON 1!

The Complex Now's avatar

This excellent analysis resonates deeply with what I observe even within large corporate structures. We are witnessing a fractal breakdown of leadership selection: managers and officers are no longer chosen for their ability to optimize the systemic flow, but for their alignment with localized extraction goals.

​When the objective function of the elite shifts from maintaining the integrity of the whole to securing the interests of a sub-group, the selection process naturally favors 'blackmailable' or compliant nodes over competent ones. It is a transition from an Abundance Engine—where leadership creates value—to a Scarcity Software, where leadership simply manages the liquidation of existing social and professional capital. We aren't just facing a moral crisis; we are facing a mechanical failure of systemic governance.

Gaius Baltar's avatar

I think you're absolutely right. My impression is that the leadership in general, both corporate and political, don't even understand the difference between the two anymore - i.e. creating value vs extracting from the existing capital.

Paving the Way's avatar

The people you describe may be better thought of as managers, not elites.

Concerned Celtiberian's avatar

Agree!!

I think of the Neoliberal and Neocon factions as the CEO and his team in a corporation. The real owners are the folks sitting at the corporate board, who own the majority of the corporation shares and who choose one CEO over another based on previous performance and the CEO’s proposed strategy.

This makes more sense IMO.

Paving the Way's avatar

We learned that Epstein for instance had direct ties and was essentially laundering money from the Rothchild dynasty. Epstein looks like a Supra consigliere, above the level of state manager.

Any Person's avatar

The Maxwell/Epstein Class is a semi-autonomous subsidiary of the Rothschild class. Ghislane's father Robert was in the same 'business' when Little Jeffie was a twinkle in his daddy's eye.

12,000 Rothschild mentions in the Epstein Files, yet nary a peep from the MSM, and little more from the 'alt-media'.

Anna Zimmerman's avatar

This is the best article I have read in what seems like about hundred years.

John Day MD's avatar

Thanks Gaius. I hope your health is now good, and remains good.

Epstein really was a unifier for these elite factions, and Maxwells, father and daughter...

I hear that the Saudis, Qataris and UAE are Epstein-friendly, but not the Iranians...

I'm rather eager for the usury Ponzi to crash, but I am not holding my breath.

It looks like tokenizing everything from the Grand Canyon to all of our kidneys can readily support the massive US national debt, and the tech-bros have it all worked out.

What A Relief!

Ride bike. Grow vegetables. Simplify your survival needs (It's not simple.)

Gaius Baltar's avatar

The whole drive toward 'tokenization' we have seen recently, particularly from the EU-Neolib Davos people, is interesting. This is of course an attempt to create collateral out of nothing so the financier rulers can put it on their books - and a control system at the same time. It demonstrates clearly whose interests WEF represents. It's one of the manipulative 'soft-power' operations the neolibs love to do.

John Day MD's avatar

Tokenization also intermediates between you and "your" property, making your "ownership" and transactions contingent upon approval by the intermediary, which has AI on the job.

You can just disappear...

RalfB's avatar

Gaius is the best.

"It would be the creator of the global regulatory gulag seen by the elites as necessary for the proper management of the world."

For very interesting details exposing this structure see: https://escapekey.substack.com/p/eleven-gates

Help Needed in KS's avatar

Where do Russia, China, and the other non-aligned countries fall? Into a third faction or are they merely by-standers and potential "victims/prey" to the other 2 groups?

Gaius Baltar's avatar

I think we can say that Russia, China, Iran and some other countries outside the West are run by sovereigntist/non-individualistic people. In Russia, for example, the country is mostly run by classical conservatives who have the support of the 'communists' - i.e. the classical socialists. This has resulted in a 'mixed system' that both can live with. The opposition there is neoliberal and neocon. It's more difficult to see what's going on in China and Iran but my guess is that countries that have been able to resist the West can do so because these two groups are cooperating on some level. Defeating these countries becomes a question of pressure and internal manipulation in order to enable the neolibs and neocons to take them over and remove their sovereignty.

Help Needed in KS's avatar

So there is no "third option", if I understand your comments. The NeoLibs and NeoCons are in ALL countries, fighting for dominance.

Gaius Baltar's avatar

They are certainly in all countries fighting for dominance - but they are not fighting together unless they're organized by the two cooperating factions who own them to do so. The problem is this cooperation. Britain is a good example. Prime Minister Sunak of the Conservative Party announced early elections specifically to enable the Labor Party to take power before the Reform UK party gained enough strength. This was obviously coordinated between the factions who run the Labor and Conservative parties. Btw, it's even possible that the same faction runs both parties in England - the country is that messed up. Now the Reform party won the local elections because both traditional socialists and traditional conservatives voted for it. It is now a conservative-socialist alliance against the 'system.' If Farage and other party leaders don't figure out what happened they will mess this up and the party will fragment because conservatives and socialists are quite different apart from having the same enemies. The real socialists have figured out that the Labor and Green parties are their enemies, and the conservatives have figured the same out about the Conservative party.

Barry Morgan's avatar

This writeup reminds me of the narrative created by the Serpent for the seduction of Eve. Brilliant, selfserving and creepy.

Gaius Baltar's avatar

This is high praise indeed! Or low praise depending on how you look at it. :)

marco's avatar

It's tempting to think of spiritual entities at work. But then we must conclude they too are deranged...

Geir Hasnes's avatar

Thank you for your great article: by your model, you are both able to explain the phenomenas we experience and the way to get out of them. You have enforced my hope to how to get out of it. I notice the other commentator speaking about spiritual forces as a point of explanation. It might be so, but it is not necessary to include such things in the model, as the human greed and lust for power are enough to explain how this is happening. I wish you all the best with your health and hope the best for further articles from you!

Darko Mulej's avatar

Sharp analysis — I've tried to extend it with a more psychological/clinical framework, addressing what I think is the piece's strongest element and its weakest (the physiognomy).

Full text if someone is curious:

https://darkomulej.substack.com/p/who-rules-the-west-and-why-they-keep

Die Untermensche's avatar

Here's wishing you the best of health. This is a very good essay.

TomA's avatar

Nothing changes until the environment changes. And a sudden and extreme change in environment will likewise produce commensurate changes in all species dwelling within that environment. Hence there will be no real pushback against any of the elites until environmental change demands it. As such, the only effective use of our brainpower in the present is toward planning for that day of reckoning. How best do we fight when the clarion sounds? Now that is task worthy of our efforts.

First things first. You must be alive and have some semblance of freedom of action on the day after. Then you must maneuver out of harms way and go dark. Only then can you focus on active measures. There are myriad ways in which each of us can make a difference. Yours will be unique to you.

By way of ancient wisdom. Simple, Secret, Solo, and Spontaneous. And everything solely within the confines of your cranium.

David Aplin's avatar

I object to your use of the phrase “mentally retarded”. It gives anyone living with mental challenges a bad name to be placed alongside those door-knobs Bauerbock and Kallas.

Gaius Baltar's avatar

You have a point there and I do apologize! No person with real disabilities should be equated to these people.

David Aplin's avatar

… but otherwise a great article, so thanks for posting

Akli's avatar

Thanks. Best thing I ve read in a very long time and I read a lot.

Joce's avatar

We all hope your health improves. And, thank you, Gaius, for your in-depth work. This article provides the most coherent explanation on the current "structure" and psychotic state of the collective west elite that I have seen so far. I also agree with some of the comments mentioning a spiritual aspect to the current mayhem. We do live in very dark times. Is there a light at the end of the tunnel?