THE NEW HERMIT KINGDOM

THE CONTAINMENT (AND DESTRUCTION) OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Europe has a decision to make. By ‘Europe’ I mean the European Union and politically and culturally similar countries, including Britain, Switzerland, the non-EU Scandinavian countries – and even countries outside Europe such as Canada, Australia and New Zealand. This group is now a ‘block’ of sorts, increasingly abandoned by the United States after Trump’s inauguration. Under Trump the US seems to be, at least partly, severing its ties to the globalist control mechanism of the West. Instead it seems to be heading for what could be called ‘true independence’ outside the control of the Trans-Atlantic Cabal – the unelected power mechanism which has up to now totally controlled the West.

The EU is now the leader of what remains of this Cabal. It is increasingly on a collision course with the US, and so are the other countries still controlled by the Cabal.

In this situation, the foreign relations of the EU become all-important. The EU is resource poor, and its economy is systematically being destroyed by its war against Russia and its oppressive regulatory mechanism which seeks to gain absolute power over all aspects of the EU economy and people’s lives.

Without access to resources and markets, the EU will wither and die. Without good foreign relations this access will be difficult. It would therefore seem to be sensible to engage in open, respectful and mutually-beneficial foreign relations.

On the other hand, the EU is a globalist test project. Its system of control over its economy and population, including the mass brainwashing of its people through near-absolute control of its information sphere, is a prototype for what the Trans-Atlantic Cabal wants the entire world to be. With the US, at least temporarily, out of the control of the Cabal, it will be tempting to use the EU to further that global agenda. In other words, the EU may try to assume the prior role of the US as the main enforcement tool of the Cabal, trying to bend the world to its will.

This would seem to be an impossible goal, and an irrational one. Still, one cannot exclude the possibility because European leaders are not known for being rational.

This is the decision the EU must make. Are they going to go into a ‘passive mode’ and adopt a mutually beneficial and respectful position against other countries? This would mean that they would be content to exist as a ‘storage unit’ for the globalist Cabal until it can regain control of the United States.

The other option is going into an ‘aggressive mode.’ An aggressive mode is dangerous because it may have consequences – including those which may lead to increased EU isolation.

At the moment, the EU seems to have decided on the aggressive mode, adopting a confrontational position toward the United States – but what about the rest of the world?

To get a better sense of what the EU intends to do, and what could be the consequences, let’s take a closer look at the situation in Europe and its current and recent relations with the non-western world.

The mind-control bubble

The EU is a structure which prioritizes power over everything else, including economic planning and value creation. The people of Europe have been successfully incorporated into this structure. They have been shaped and configured to fit the structure, and moved into a parallel world with EU-specific logic and facts. This has been achieved through the near-total control over European media – which has for a long time functioned as mind-control tool of the Trans-Atlantic Cabal. As a result, Europeans have been isolated from reality and turned into tools themselves, with the ‘correct’ beliefs, values and motivations. This has made the EU almost bulletproof against internal dissension, at least in the western part. The EU elites have been similarly configured.

In the minds of European elites and most of the European people, Europe (represented by the European Union of course) is the center of the world – if not the Universe. They are confident of European importance and power, and the centrality of their culture. Their perception of ‘cultural centrality’ means that Europeans, by and large, believe that their views are somehow the default views of humanity. Any other views range from being ignorant deviations up to being dangerous and immoral – and only held by inferior people.

This cultural centrality has created a pompous and narcissistic atmosphere in Europe, even among the part of the population that is not technically narcissistic. Europeans are quick to dismiss and subsequently dehumanize those they see as having deviant views. European politicians and a large part of the European population have not been hesitant to express those views. They perceive the Chinese as thieving and untrustworthy, the Russians as subhuman animals, and Trump voters as racist imbeciles. They are not hesitant to tell you this, even without being prompted to do so.

Europeans, by and large, also suffer from megalomania – another narcissistic trait. The best example I’ve heard of this (and I mentioned in another essay) is an answer from a dedicated EU admirer when I asked him how Europe would be able to enforce its ESG logistics chain laws globally. He said that it was the ‘Brussels effect.’ Brussels is so powerful that if it writes a law, even one that benefits Europe at the cost of others, the world will be compelled to obey.

Still, deep down the rulers of Europe know that Europe is weak. They know that they cannot exercise global influence or wage war against Russia without American power. They know that economically Europe is both weak and small – with less than 15% of global GDP – and less in terms of real economic output. Economically, the only strong card they hold is being a market for others – and that card is getting weaker as Europeans get poorer.

In most European elites and citizens this reality is still buried deep in the subconscious. They still believe in European power, influence and moral superiority – despite being a part of an increasingly impoverished and crime-ridden totalitarian civilization which runs elections the same way the Soviet Union ran show trials. Lack of self-awareness is another trait of narcissism.

Arrival of the evil Trump

Nothing is worse than reality, and the last few weeks have been difficult for the European Union. First the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the end of unipolarity. The West will no longer seek to rule the world. Then Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the technical end of NATO. He told the EU crowd that they could go to war with Russia if they wanted to, but the US wouldn’t have their backs. Then Vice President Vance, at the Munich security conference, told them that the EU is a totalitarian structure, no better than the Soviet Union. Vance was actually wrong about that. The EU is becoming what the Soviet Union would have become if Trotsky had won against Stalin – i.e. worse.

To twist the knife further in the wound, Vance also stated that the values (and politics) of the EU had become incompatible with American values. This was an important statement, to say the least, although not sweeping enough because EU values have become incompatible with most of the world.

Vance’s speech very clearly illuminated the extreme contrast that has been developing between the EU and the rest of the world. It was like watching a spaghetti-western era Clint Eastwood walking into a gay club.

The EU’s problem is that Vance is not just some isolated example of an American Macho Man. Vance now represents what most of the world outside the EU actually is. The world is Clint Eastwood while the EU is adopting an increasingly extreme alternative lifestyle. Considering how scared the EU elites are now, I would speculate that diaper fetish is a part of that lifestyle.

When it rains, it pours – and things for the EU got even worse. The US promptly announced that negotiations with Russia would commence on Ukraine and other matters of mutual interest. The US also announced that the EU would not be a part of these negotiations. The EU had nothing to contribute to the negotiations and would even try to sabotage them. This moved the EU panic up to maximum. After all, narcissists hate nothing more than irrelevance.

All this signifies an eventual withdrawal of the US from both the EU and Ukraine. That has important consequences many people do not seem to have realized: the War in Ukraine used to be between Russia and NATO. Now it will be between Russia and the European Union.

No wonder there’s panic.

The road to containment

There are two practical reasons why the US excluded the EU from the negotiations on Ukraine. The first one is the inability of the EU to admit to the real causes of the war – without which the problem can’t be fixed. To do so would destroy the narrative of good (Ukraine/EU) versus bad (Russia) and implicate the EU in the causes of the war. This would leave the EU naked before the truth.

The second reason is that the EU gambled everything on the war. They bet their economy, their military power, their geopolitical influence, and their internal stability, on Russia’s defeat. They approached the war like a gambler who bet his house and all his money on what he thought was a winning hand. Then they lost – and now they are refusing to vacate their house. In other words, if the war stops, their utter defeat will become realized. The war must therefore continue and they must therefore sabotage any peace negotiations. They can, therefore, not be included.

Those are just the immediate and practical reasons. There are other reasons, more serious and significant – which may lead to the exclusion of the EU from more than just the negotiations on Ukraine.

The main reason is the political and cultural situation in the EU – and associated countries. European culture and politics have undergone full-spectrum dissociation from the rest of the world and there is virtually no common ground anymore. To others the EU has become an alien entity which has abandoned everything which, to them, defines a human civilization.

This is not because the world outside the West is changing. There has been a massive cultural divide between the EU and the non-western world for a long time. What happened was a ‘pivot event’ when the Trans-Atlantic Cabal (an appropriate name in more ways than one) lost control of the United States with the election of Donald Trump. When that happened, the US pivoted culturally, militarily and economically away from the EU. Up to that point the US had been a cultural gay club like the EU, and had enabled the EU’s existence and activities through force applied against the rest of the world.

Now the EU is culturally, and increasingly economically, isolated – and the isolation is getting worse. Communications with the rest of the world, including economic and diplomatic, are systematically breaking down – and are reaching a point where they can’t be maintained.

The divide causing this communication breakdown and isolation is caused by both European values and European behavior. In other words, the values of the EU and its behavior are increasingly not being tolerated by the rest of the world. This lack of tolerance now also applies to the United States. Let’s discuss these value and behavioral divides.

The value divide

The EU has a number of social (and related economic) policies enforced within its borders. The EU, however, is not content with enforcing them only there and has sought to enforce them on the rest of the world – using US power up until now. Enacted inside the EU these policies are seen by non-western governments as merely crazy, but when they are enforced on them they become upgraded to a threat. Now the EU (along with other Cabal countries) is the only entity attempting to foist these policies upon the world, and therefore becomes the focus of that threat instead of the United States. The EU has thus graduated from being just insane to being something that needs to be dealt with – and now the US is not there anymore to defend it, do its bidding, and take the blame.

Let’s look at three examples of these policies.

Anti-society policies

Non-western countries, and now the United States, generally believe that a stable society cannot be operated without certain foundations. These foundations are mainly the family and the moral values which keep it strong. These foundations will then define society through ‘upward migration’ and keep it stable and healthy.

The policy of the EU is the exact opposite. The EU is anti-family, anti-woman, anti-man, anti-children, anti-religion, anti-morality, anti-normality, anti-freedom, anti-merit, and anti-consequences of action. The EU carries out a constant war against these foundations, as well as the economic foundations of its societies.

All sane governments will reject this. They clearly see that these policies will dissolve their countries, resulting in a demographic catastrophe and an economic collapse. Any EU influence on their societies must therefore be blocked for their own survival.

Anti-sovereignty policies

The key characteristic of the emerging multipolar world is the sovereignty of nations. Sovereignty is a precondition for any system where the government is accountable to its people, whether it’s democracy or something else. A government simply cannot be accountable to its people if it takes orders from another country or organization. A country like that will invariably stagnate and devolve into a totalitarian dystopia – losing its competitiveness against other countries to boot.

The foundation of the EU system is the abolition of the sovereignty of European nations. The foundation of EU foreign policy is the abolition of the sovereignty of other nations. We saw that recently in Georgia where the EU (along with USAID – a slush fund for the Trans-Atlantic Cabal) financed and supported an attempted color revolution. As usual, EU officials weren’t subtle and participated in the paid-for protests themselves.

All sane governments see this as completely incompatible with the emerging multipolar consensus – and as a direct threat to their countries. Blocking EU political influence therefore becomes a priority for anyone who wishes his nation to be sovereign and prosperous.

Pro-corruption policies

Systemic corruption, when it reaches certain level, tends to increase exponentially until it consumes the entire society. Eventually the government will only be serving the corrupt, resulting in a situation similar to a loss of sovereignty to a foreign power. The end result of systemic corruption is always a large vampiric class of people, gorging on the blood of taxpayers.

Dealing with systemic corruption has been a priority for key countries outside the West for the last quarter century or more. After the nineties Russia was decimated by corruption partly brought on by loss of sovereignty – and dealing with it has been Vladimir Putin’s greatest task. China has as well enacted harsh measures against corruption, including by simply executing corrupt officials. Now the US has embarked upon an anti-corruption purge using Musk’s DOGE task force.

In contrast, the EU system is literally based on corruption. One could even go further and say that the EU system is systemic corruption. Imposed social systems aren’t really subjective ‘organizational’ things. They are people selected for their traits, put in arranged positions, and then further configured. The EU system is completely vampiric in nature. It consists of politicians in the thousands, bureaucrats in the tens of thousands, and accomplices in the millions, who suck the blood out of European taxpayers and businesses. Any action taken in the EU against systemic corruption will immediately clash with this system, and will therefore not be allowed.

Any and all influence operations by the EU in foreign countries aim at creating vampire covens in those countries which will be helped to grow (with NGO money and direct EU support) until they can feast on the entire country. The main purpose of the EU regulatory system is the creation of more vampires, and the push to expand it outside the EU is a push to create more vampires outside the EU.

Since this is always the main aim of EU foreign policy, any contact with the EU will breed corruption. Any sane government will take measures against this, as the Georgian government did with their foreign agent law.

The behavioral divide

Anyone who has been following geopolitical developments for the last few years will have noticed a change in behavior of western leaders and diplomats toward their non-western counterparts. Their behavior has become the equivalent of walking into a home in Japan in muddy boots: rude, disrespectful, and lacking in self-awareness. The new US administration has been trying to reset relations with key countries, including China, Russia and India – while the EU seems to have escalated their muddy-boots activities – and widened them to include the United States.

Let’s discuss three examples of this behavior.

Disrespect

EU (and Biden administration) diplomats and political elites have become notorious for their disrespectful behavior toward anyone who does not submit to them or share their values. Every meeting is an opportunity for a lecture on the superiority of EU/western values and the inferiority of local values. Every meeting contains criticism on how the other party runs their society, because it’s inferior to the EU/western way. Every meeting is an opportunity for pompous contempt, virtue signaling and outright lies.

This has gone so far, and frustrated non-western governments so much, that they have even violated diplomatic etiquette and reacted to it. Indian Foreign Minister Jaishankar has repeatedly discussed western ‘hypocrisy’ while the Chinese and others have even shown western (and particularly EU) visitors outright disrespect by, for example, not receiving them formally when they come for a visit – or simply by ignoring them.

This has resulted in isolation of EU/western representatives to a far greater degree than most people realize. Nobody really wants to talk to them or listen to their narcissistic ramblings. Their access to non-western diplomats and leaders has decreased – and generally nobody believes anything they say.

Now this diplomatic ‘tactic’ is being applied by the EU and its allies against the United States and Donald Trump. That will not end well.

Regulatory encroachment

The West has long been confused about the jurisdiction of its laws – particularly the Americans. They have often assumed that US laws are somehow binding for the entire planet. The funniest example of this is the notorious Swedish file-sharing site ‘The Pirate Bay.’ They used to have a page where they displayed threats from American lawyers because they had violated some US law – and their own responses. Both the letters and the responses were hilarious – the letters for the absolute dissociation from reality and the responses for their eloquent rudeness.

The EU has taken this to a new level. The first sign of this were the so-called ‘energy packages’ from Brussels, which essentially demanded the breakup and indirect control of Gazprom. It is likely that some people in Brussels were delusional enough to actually believe that their regulatory delirium would be accepted by the Russians of all people.

The EU hasn’t stopped and has now created an extremely oppressive ESG regulatory package for European companies in order to monitor and control their entire logistics chains. Of course, a secondary objective is to create new hordes of bureaucratic vampires to manage it – paid for by the companies themselves. This regulatory nightmare also applies to logistics chains outside the EU – and to non-EU companies if they have operations within the EU.

Foreign companies importing stuff to Europe, and/or operating there, will have to A) set up giant bureaucracies to comply with EU regulations and B) pay fines if in violation, which are a percentage (5%) of their global operations. The real purpose of these regulations (apart from extortion) is to seize as much control as possible over non-EU logistics chains and resources, and to create pools of EU-sympathetic vampires outside the EU.

This attempt to regulate the entire world has run into problems because the Qatari Energy Minister outright threatened to stop selling natural gas to Europe – currently 5% of imported gas. It is likely that other energy exporters will follow and gang up on the EU. In the face of such insane regulatory power grabs, the world is increasingly likely to see the EU market as not worth it. It would actually not be surprising if non-EU countries set up their own regulatory framework to defend against this encroachment, resulting in increased economic isolation of the EU. That is what they should do anyway.

Open interference

One of the characteristic of the European leadership class is their utter lack of self-awareness. They believe that they can get away with anything, and there will never be consequences for their actions.

Nowhere is this better demonstrated than in their shameless open interference in the internal affairs of other countries. During the EU/USAID financed revolution attempt in Georgia, EU politicians actually showed up to participate in the protests. Also, the Starmer ‘government’ in the UK sent a task force of 100 people to assist Kamala Harris in the US presidential elections. There are many other examples like this.

The main problem with this behavior is that it humiliates the countries it affects, and shows extreme disrespect. Covert interference is one thing, but interference out in the open is completely different. Few things motivate more than humiliation and disrespect in the international arena – and this behavior will have consequences.

This behavior is also quite extraordinary because the EU constantly accuses others of interfering in EU internal affairs, including elections. Doublethink is yet another symptom of narcissism.

Escalating responses

Bad behavior and toxic cultural influences can be tolerated for a long time as long as the offending party is strong. This was the case while the US was the designated enforcer of the Cabal. However, when the offending entity is weak, responses may become more severe.

We have actually seen this happen for the last 2-3 years. The West’s problems in their war against Russia were perceived as weakness by the non-western world. Non-western states became more confident and vocal. They started ignoring coercive economic measures taken by the West, and they even started purging their countries of western influence. This was particularly obvious in Africa where the EU/France has been kicked out of the Sahel region. That would not have happened without the perception of western weakness and Russian strength to back it up.

As the US is seen to have left the Cabal-controlled ‘West’ – what remains will be seen as much weaker than before. It is even possible that the bad-guy image the US has in most of the non-western world will switch over to the EU. That could lead to a tougher position taken against the EU by the outside world.

There’s also another issue. As the EU is increasingly seen as weaker, and also the bad guy, the spotlight may increasingly fall on its misdeeds – which have in the past been carefully hidden behind the misdeeds of the US. The EU’s aggression against foreign states may become more visible, resulting in measures not possible before. We already have an example of this.

Recently the President of Congo offered the US access to minerals, seemingly in return for US protection against a proxy invasion from Rwanda. Rwanda sponsored ‘rebels’ have invaded Congo to seize its mineral riches. This has been obfuscated and hidden by the western media – for a good reason.

What is happening in Congo appears to be the following: Rwanda is an EU/UK proxy state where the EU has made a big deal for critical minerals. Some of these minerals actually seem to be sourced (stolen) from Congo. To put it bluntly, the EU/UK have launched a proxy invasion of Congo for its minerals, and Congo’s president has asked the US for help – against the EU and Britain.

It’s not necessary to explain further how significant this is, and why it isn’t being discussed much in western mainstream media. It is clear that this offer would never have been made without the changes in the international position of the US. Will Trump come to the rescue against EU aggression and make a deal for Congo’s minerals? That remains to be seen.

If I were a betting man (which I’m not), I would bet on this being a beginning of a trend.

A stake through the heart

Escalating responses from the non-western world leading to increased EU isolation may not be the worst-case scenario for the EU. What happens if two of the three superpowers simply decide to go after the EU? What happens if Russia and the US decide that the EU is an entity which cannot be tolerated on the face of the planet?

This may sound far-fetched and fanciful, but it’s not entirely impossible. Actually, there are some signs that this may happen. But first, why would it happen?

For drastic measures to be taken, the EU must be perceived by others as an existential threat. So far, the EU has managed to appear non-threatening by hiding behind the US and by camouflaging itself with fake virtues of democracy, human rights and environmentalism. However, behind that camouflage there is a completely different entity. While the most of the global population doesn’t see though this camouflage, the US Administration, the Russians, the Chinese, the Indians, the Africans, and many others, do see through it.

What they see is an entity which is now the center of the globalist Cabal which has sought to dominate the world. This Cabal has tried to subjugate Russia with the Ukraine war, resulting in the deaths of more than a million Slavs. To maintain its control of the US, this Cabal tried to put President Trump in jail, and (probably) tried to assassinate him not once, but twice.

Wars and assassinations constitute an existential threat – and the EU is now seen by these countries as the center of that threat. This perception of the EU is now gaining ground all over the world. It will influence how key countries decide to deal with the EU.

Should other countries, particularly the US and Russia, decide to go after the EU, there are many things they can do:

• The US can target the EU with tariffs and other economic and financial methods to crush what is left of European industry. It can engineer things in such a way that European companies, particularly German ones, must leave the EU to survive. They could be enticed to move to the US with some of their skilled workforce, helping Trump with the reindustrialization of the United States.

• The US could specifically target the EU financial system, causing the EU (already fake and manipulated) bond market to spiral out of control. This would cause a financial apocalypse in Europe.

• The US could place a ban on the export of natural gas to the EU. After all, the reindustrialization of the US will require a lot of gas.

• The US could simply take over European colonies. They could seize Greenland, which is a neglected EU colony, and assimilate parts of Canada, which is a British colony.

• Russia could place a ban on the re-entry of European companies into Russia after the Ukraine war ends.

• Russia could decide not to reopen any natural gas pipelines to the EU after the war ends.

• Russia could decide to demand control of Odessa, thereby seizing control of EU access to the Black Sea.

• Russia could place an export ban on all raw materials for industry on the EU after the war.

Some of these actions are already being considered – make of that what you will. The possibilities are endless, and a war is not required to crush the EU. The only question is whether they will decide to do it. I think they should.

P.S. I do have a tip jar if you want to support me. Many thanks to everyone who has done so in the past.