WORLD WAR III SITUATION REPORT

LET THE GOOD TIMES ROLL!

The global situation is, to put it mildly, getting interesting. Various scenarios are possible, few of them good – particularly for the West. The fog of war makes the situation unclear, and the fog of the mind in the West makes the future even more unclear. It’s time for a sitrep, and some highly irresponsible speculation.

Masters of strategy

Back in the glory days of the Biden Administration the West’s foreign policy was offensive. The West was going to seal the deal for global supremacy. Russia would be crushed like a bug and China would be left alone and helpless. The almighty US Navy would blockade China while the new Western Government of Russia would close the northern border. No more resources or markets – and China would be starved into democracy and proper values.

Huge amounts of justly stolen collateral would flow into the western financial system and the pyramid scheme underpinning the West would live to see many more days. The western Financier Cabal would survive and could proceed with their great resets and social engineering plans. The Cabalists and their political puppets in the US and the EU were ecstatic because they had won before the plan was even executed.

The western elites employ only the best strategists and planners. They are truly geniuses who can visualize any possible future. They are able to plan operations while taking even the most unexpected events into account in all eighteen dimensions. Their assumptions are so strong that they can even shape reality itself, and turn it upside down. The assumptions underlying their plans were bold and bulletproof:

• The enemy will not make any countermoves while our plan unfolds.

• The enemy will not figure out our weaknesses because we don’t have any.

If there ever was a better plan for world domination, I’m not aware of it.

Still, somehow, this plan failed. The war in Ukraine is not going so well, and the non-western world has joined forces to defend against the West. A new financial system that doesn’t use the dollar is taking shape, threats of sanctions do not work anymore, western economies are collapsing, and everyone is panicking. Europe, in particular, is in bad shape. The leaders are unpopular at home and despised abroad despite their best efforts at lecturing foreign leaders on morality and democracy.

Nothing demonstrates western moral superiority better than transitioning from one gender to another – or even from one species to another. One can be a male human today and a female dog tomorrow if one so wishes. Western politicians, particularly the European ones, experienced exactly that. They transitioned from respected and self-assured glorious leaders into bitches.

Europe has transitioned from a Garden of Eden on its way to rule the world through superior morality, sustainability regulations, and carbon taxes, into a desperate sewer. Her leaders crawl around, barking at each other; licking the boots of the man they hate the second most: Donald Trump.

In the US the situation is almost as bad. The current priority of the US Government is to hide the bankruptcy of the country by pretending to sell treasuries while faking inflation numbers caused by money printing. The Biden neoliberals are quiet in their burrows while the exceptionalists and neocons have obviously contracted rabies. Others are not doing what America tells them to do. How can that be? We thought we were gods!

How on Earth did this happen? Well, the enemy correctly identified the West’s main weakness and is making countermoves. Turns out no one really wants to be a bitch – unless you live in Europe or your name is Lindsey Graham.

Becoming weak on purpose

Both the United States and the European Union have been preparing for their future ‘system of governance’ through engineered degrowth for decades. They tuned down their economies while wealth was moved from the people to the elites. In their quest for sustainability they made the West economically unsustainable.

For a long time, probably at least the last 30-40 years, the West has needed ‘free’ wealth from the non-western world to survive as the degrowth plan was carried out. That, however, was only supposed to be temporary. As the West secured its global dominance, the non-western economies would go through degrowth as well. All the wealth in the world would migrate upward to the Financier Cabal, and everyone else would live their lives as renters – if they were allowed to live at all.

The West (particularly the United States) has been able to carry out its degrowth policies because it can finance their societies through money printing. Money printing always causes inflation. If you print a trillion dollars, that trillion will correspondingly affect the value of savings and increase the cost of living. Money printing is essentially an indirect tax on the population. The dollar, however, is the global reserve currency. It is used globally in trade – and a huge part of global debt is in dollars. This means that when the United States prints money to run the government and to keep the economy going, the entire world will absorb the resulting inflation – not just the United States.

This also means that when the United States runs its government at a deficit, and falsifies its economy through debt increase, the entire world will experience inflation as a result and suffer a drop in living standards. US deficits and money printing are thus basically a tax on the world. This tax allows the US to operate its global empire.

Until now the non-western world has been forced to go along with this taxation because the West has monopolized the international financial and trading systems – another source of western revenue. Stray away from the dollar and you’ll be excluded from the system, regime-changed or invaded. This is now changing – and not in a small way.

If the global use of the dollar decreases, the ‘absorption area’ for dollar inflation will decrease. More and more of the inflation caused by printing dollars will therefore impact the United States – and countries with currencies attached to the dollar – which happen to be the European countries. If spending in the West remains the same (or increases) while the use of the dollar decreases globally – the result will be hyperinflation in the West and a collapse – first economic and then social. We are seeing this happen right now.

The reserve dollar is the West’s weakness – and it’s a mortal weakness.

The United States as an ATM machine

To understand this weakness better, we need to see things from the point of view of the Financier Cabal and their minions. We especially need to see what the United States is to them.

From their point of view the US is an ATM machine, a racketeering syndicate and an extortion operation rolled into one.

The US elites use the dollar and its reserve currency status to suck wealth from the entire world. They also use the well-known US domestic ‘wealth pump’ to suck the life out of the US working and middle classes.

All this stolen and extorted money is then used to finance the entire western Cabal/Deep State – including their enforcers (the US Military & NATO, the Intelligence Services, Al-Qaeda, HTS/ISIS, Israel, Ukraine, and various other sociopaths), the Military-Industrial Complex, and the European Union.

In other words, the thing financing all this evil is the reserve-currency dollar. Without the reserve status of the dollar, money can’t be collected from the non-western world, and money can’t be printed and borrowed endlessly inside the United States. Without the reserve dollar, all the neocons, the trans/woke neolibs, the Cabal companies running America, and the European Union elites, will lose their shirts – and their power over their slave populations.

For them there is no solution other than to maintain the reserve status of the dollar. No other option is even remotely possible at this point. The US cannot truly reindustrialize without a bloody revolution to remove the Cabal companies and the managerial class sucking the life out of the country, and Europe cannot reindustrialize without the same thing happening – and because they have no resources to do so. Fixing Europe or fixing America economically in the short or even medium term is just delusional nonsense. It’s not going to happen.

As a reserve currency the dollar has not only financed all this evil – all the wars, all the terrorism, all the mass murders, all the regime changes – and global oppression. It has also allowed the Cabal to finance a monstrous and parasitic (woke and incompetent) managerial class and to destroy the middle and working classes of the United States and Europe. Having a reserve currency is a curse like no other – unless you are a sociopath seeking world domination.

Someone probably sat down with Trump and ‘explained’ this to him. The fate of the Financier Cabal and the Deep State is now intertwined with America’s fate, and it’s time to accept that and act accordingly. As a result he mostly gave up on his reindustrialization ideas and decided to go all in defending the dollar. Subsequently he got rid of Elon, neutered DOGE, and allowed Trotskyist infiltrator Lindsey Graham to slide in through the backdoor to become a foreign policy chief or sorts. He is the modern and highly simplified reincarnation of Henry Kissinger (another Trotskyist infiltrator). The policies intended to Make America Great Again, including the tariffs, were repurposed to wage war on the world on behalf of the dollar. Trump now sees US domination of the world as existential for the United States. Perhaps he always did.

The way things have developed, particularly after the reconciliation between China and India, are not encouraging for the West. For once, the Deep Staters and the EU elites aren’t imagining things. The dollar is as good as dead as a global reserve currency, and they are screwed. The only option is war for the survival of the dollar, and the survival of the western elites. The western people and the western countries only exist now as assets to be sacrificed to win that war.

So, what’s the plan?

The main property of the current situation is its urgency. The western globalist machine is being defunded NOW. Our rulers are losing their power NOW. Western countries are going bankrupt NOW. Things are going to hell NOW. This has finally dawned on our ruling class and they are panicking. It’s time for a plan, and as everyone knows, panic is not exactly the best state of mind to come up with plans.

So, what is the plan? Well, there seem to be two plans with some division of labor. The West is going to engage in two wars: one against the BRICS (the global opposition) and one against Russia. The West is already at war with Russia, so that part of the plan is more of a ‘continuation war’ with escalations.

Will these plans remain just plans or will they be put into action? That’s the big question. The panic and indecision is such that western leaders look and sound like sufferers of rapid cycling bipolar disorder. They transition between mania and depression constantly. One day they are manically determined and bullish – the next day they are deeply depressed and desperate. Who knows what the final decision will be. Still, it’s best to err on the side of caution and assume these plans will be carried out. Let’s speculate on those plans.

War plan I – BRICS

The first order of business is to neutralize the threat against the dollar – which comes from the new trading and financial mechanisms developed by the BRICS countries. This will primarily be carried out by the United States and Britain – with help from the European Union where necessary.

The first phase of this plan is Trump’s tariff threats against BRIC states, primarily Brazil and India. So far, this has failed catastrophically because it unified BRICS countries rather than breaking them apart. Since failure proves nothing in the neocon world, this phase is still ongoing. Trump might still decide to implement massive tariffs against anyone who buys energy from Russia – which includes China and India. The results will be catastrophic for the United States – but these are desperate times.

The second, third, fourth, and so forth phases of the plan are terrorism and war. The goal is to chip away at BRICS and associated countries using military force, terrorism and regime change operations. Countries perceived as vulnerable and isolated will be targeted first. We can expect the following to happen:

• War and/or forceful regime change operations against peripheral BRICS states and aligned states starting with Venezuela and Iran.

• Fomenting further unrest and regime change operations in Asia and possibly Africa. Any available useful idiots will be weaponized against their own societies – primarily woke liberals, but also Nazis, exceptionalists, radical Muslims, and whatever can be mobilized. The West isn’t picky.

• Increasing the use of intimidation tactics and military aggression, seemingly without constraints. Expect the unexpected.

• Leveraging proxies in the Caucasus (Armenia and Azerbaijan) to create unrest on Russia’s and Iran’s borders.

• Exporting Salafist jihadists from Syria and other places into Central Asian states to create unrest on the southern borders of Russia. Expect some form of Chechnya 2.0.

• Increase in western-sponsored terrorism in Russia, Iran and other states perceived as vulnerable.

• And so on and so forth.

The main goal of this phase is to fracture BRICS by creating chaos, and if necessary to wage outright war. The secondary goal is to steal their oil and other resources – of course. We can expect much overtime for CIA, Mossad and MI6 agents in the coming years, and a lot to bonuses for jihadists in the Middle East. American soldiers can expect to die glorious deaths for the elites who hate them.

War plan II – Russia

This part of the plan will primarily be carried out by the European Union and Britain, with critical logistics and intelligence support from the United States. The United States seems to have refused more involvement than that – annoying the EU leaders. The EU will therefore have to conduct operations against Russia by themselves, although US support will be critical. There are two likely reasons for this passivity from the US. Firstly, the US will be busy dealing with the BRICS and ‘securing (looting) the western hemisphere.’ Secondly, US involvement in Ukraine will simply be too risky. Serious contact between the Americans and the Russians there might easily escalate beyond the nuclear threshold. Trump wants to avoid that – although some of the neocons around him think a nuclear war is a great idea.

The EU plan can be split into a defensive plan and an offensive plan – or an inside plan and an outside plan. Let’s take a closer look.

The inside (defensive) plan

The inside plan is intended to maintain control over the European Union while the war against Russia and the BRICS is ongoing. The situation in Europe is serious and there is a possibility of major crisis in three key countries: Britain, France and Germany. Social unrest is likely, as well as elections not going the EU’s way. There is also the problem of sovereigntist countries causing problems – primarily Hungary and Slovakia. The problems the EU needs to deal with range from angry citizens up to rebel leaders of individual countries. All these people must be kept in check.

We are likely to see the EU carry out the following actions in the near future:

• We can expect massive increase in censorship and arrests of dissenters. Zero tolerance policy will be adopted and people will be arrested for anything which may be interpreted as critical of their governments or the EU as a whole – or ‘anti-authority’ in general. This has already gone pretty far in Europe but will be pushed much farther. It is possible that the army will be used against the public – for example in Britain.

• Elections will be rigged wherever necessary and results canceled if the rigging fails. This has already been done in Moldova and (almost certainly) in Germany.

• Political parties will be either banned or excluded from participating in elections. Political leaders will be increasingly banned from elections and/or jailed. The use of threats and blackmail will increase, resulting in surprise retirements of popular politicians. This has already started, for example in Romania.

• Political murders and assassinations will be stepped up. Troublesome politicians or candidates for elections will die mysterious deaths. Bankers, businessmen, industrialists, bloggers and other influential people who stray from the program or create obstacles will receive the ‘Alfred Herrhausen’ treatment – i.e. be murdered. This has apparently already started with the rather obvious murders of AfD candidates in Germany. You have been warned, rebel scum!

• Regime changes will most likely be attempted in Hungary, Slovakia and Serbia. All countries must be brought to heel.

• Engineering a war in the Balkans is likely, particularly if Serbia cannot be regime-changed properly – or if Republika Srpska declares independence – or something like that. Cyrillic-reading troglodytes and the Orthodox Church must be purged from the European Garden.

• And so on and so forth.

Maintaining control is all-important for the EU because this is where its greatest weakness can be found. More on that later.

The outside (offensive) plan

The West has, apparently, performed a new analysis on the situation using their Masters of Strategy. They have come to the conclusion that a short and decisive victory over Russia is impossible. That’s quite an insight after nearly four years of unsuccessful war with exactly that purpose. Instead the West has decided to adopt the Russian method of war by attrition. Maintain pressure long enough and Russia will eventually fracture through exhaustion. Should that not happen, it will serve to keep the Russians occupied while the US and Britain deal with the BRICS. It’s a guaranteed win-win strategy according to the Strategy Masters.

All the preparations made by the EU point to this plan being real. The EU is arming itself, appropriately using a five-year plan. In 2030 or thereabouts ‘we have to be ready for a war with Russia’ and here’s a trillion euros to get things going. This is, of course, disinformation. The war will escalate soon, and the five-year plan is to sustain it.

The West has also come to the conclusion that escalation against Russia is a viable option. The Kursk invasion, which was a NATO operation from stem to stern, was almost certainly partly intended as a test to see what the Russians would do in the case of invasion of Russia proper. Would they nuke someone or show restraint? No nukes arrived, so they wouldn’t nuke anyone if Kaliningrad were to be attacked, would they? The West, and particularly the EU, is now confident that it can get away with significant escalations as a part of its pressure and attrition policy. Escalations are therefore being planned.

We can expect the following to happen in the near future – if the EU doesn’t crumble soon or its leaders chicken out:

European intervention in Ukraine – This is now a very likely scenario. There are rumors that the plan is to send at least 50,000 troops, and probably more, into Ukraine. These troops will primarily come from France and Britain, but probably from Poland and other countries as well. The main purpose is to prevent the Russians from reaching the EU borders and to secure Ukrainian natural resources for Europe – i.e. to loot Ukraine.

The original plan was to trick the Russians into a ceasefire and then immediately flood western and northern Ukraine with European troops. Since the Russians couldn’t be tricked (this time) the troops will most likely be sent in regardless. The troop buildup seems to have begun to some degree. There are already some numbers of French and British troops in Odessa and other cities – acclimatizing and getting mentally prepared for war with the help of cheap booze and Ukrainian prostitutes.

These soldiers will not have NATO/US security guarantees and will have no inherent deterrence value against the Russians. They will become priority targets for the Russians, who will kill as many of them as they can in the shortest time possible.

Transnistria – The breakaway region from Moldova has Russian troops and large Soviet-era ammo dumps. It’s likely that Moldova, with EU help, will attack the Russian forces there.

The Baltic/Finland – The probability of escalation from Finland is higher than most people realize. It is likely that some ‘event’ will be manufactured, possibly involving the Baltic Sea. The goals of this escalation will be to close the Baltic Sea for Russian maritime traffic in order to put economic pressure on Russia – and to put further pressure on the Russian military. Finland will likely front this ‘event’ and its consequences – which will have a military dimension. It is likely that the plan is to involve all the Scandinavian countries in this escalation as both logistic and military support for Finland.

This could very well be a greater escalation than European intervention in Ukraine and could result in serious fireworks. If things get out of hand we could see an all-out war between Russia and Finland – and consequently between Russia and the entire Scandinavian region – i.e. Finland, Sweden, Norway and probably Denmark. This may sound far-fetched but it’s not as outlandish as one might think.

There are other possible points of escalation in Europe but these three are the most likely. An attack on Kaliningrad by Poland and the Baltic states is also possible – but is unlikely to be among the initial escalation efforts. However, desperate people tend to be unpredictable so who knows.

Kamikaze Scandinavia and ideological preparedness

Should you want to use a nation as cannon fodder against another nation, ideological preparation is necessary. A nation will not enter a non-defensive war which will result in mass casualties unless the proper level of brainwashing has been achieved. In other words, if you want to avoid backlash at home, you need to have a population who wants to go to war – or a population under very tight control – knowledge-wise or otherwise. Ideological control or preparedness can be achieved by various means. Economic problems and poverty are good if you can blame the right people. Fear-mongering works – but not necessarily for ‘proactive’ wars. Control can also be established by indoctrination starting in childhood.

Exactly that was done to prepare Ukraine for being used against Russia, starting immediately after the fall of the Soviet Union – and before that in the case of western Ukraine. Western Ukraine’s Nazi leanings were encouraged and supported by the West – and turned into a mass movement with torchlight marches and Third Reich customs and symbols. A fake history and mythology was created for Ukraine and put into school books. Russophobia was made a part of the curriculum. This worked quite well – as we have seen.

There are, however, surprisingly few countries in Europe that are ideologically ready to be sacrificed in a war against Russia. There might even be a backlash in a deranged Russophobic country such as Germany if its authorities were to engage in an open war against Russia. The same might possibly apply to Poland, and very likely Romania. If things go out of control on the battlefield they might go out of control at home as well. This means that the pool of suicide counties is not as great as the EU authorities would prefer.

If we can identify which counties are brainwashed enough to jump willingly into the fire, we can also predict which countries are likely to be used to escalate militarily against Russia. There are a few countries that are quite prepared, and those will likely be used.

Among those are the Baltic countries – Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Their brainwashing level is very similar to Ukraine. They have certain pride in their past as collaborators with Nazi Germany, and Russophobia is systematically manufactured much like in Ukraine. It is therefore likely that the Baltic countries will be used in some way, possibly in a Finnish-led escalation.

The other countries ideologically ready for mass sacrifice are the Scandinavian countries – all of them. This might sound strange to some readers so let’s elaborate.

The Scandinavian populations are extremely isolated from reality. A large majority doesn’t even realize how bad the situation is in their neighboring countries to the south – and think everything is just fine. Trust in institutions is high and they basically believe everything the media tells them.

The Scandinavian countries have been prosperous for a long time which has delayed consequences for their catastrophic social policies. People generally do not wake up until they experience problems personally – or are humiliated. This hasn’t happened yet to a sufficient number of them and they have therefore had an unusually long consequence-free time to get brainwashed to their core.

The Scandinavian brainwashing of choice is feminism. The Scandinavian countries have Trotskyist/feminist social policies which have shaped their populations for decades. They essentially practice ‘consensus totalitarianism’ based on feminism – a sub-ideology of Trotskyism. Their populations have been successfully conditioned for a long time to accept feminist control from the most basic (such as child rearing) up to government – and everything in between.

A key characteristic of feminism is hatred – particularly of the Patriarchy. This hatred has been assimilated by a large majority of the Scandinavian populations and disdain for the masculine has become a part of the culture. As it happens there is nothing that signifies the Patriarchy better than Russia – where the Orthodox Church even has a ‘Patriarch.’ For feminists Russia almost represents the archetypal masculine. Feminist (and neoliberal) hatred of Russia is based on this to a large degree.

Due to this feminist brainwashing, the gullibility, and the docility, all that is needed to get Scandinavians to hate Russia is to tell them to do so in the media. They will accept any lies or justifications for war with Russia like good little zombies – and will not consider the consequences. In some ways, Scandinavians are probably as deeply indoctrinated as the Ukrainians – despite the methods being different.

If Finland agrees to be the next escalation flashpoint against Russia, the other Scandinavian countries will support the Finns – both logistically and militarily – and the majority of the populations will approve.

A Russian response

The speculative part of this essay might not come true – partly or at all. Let’s hope it doesn’t. However, erring on the side of caution is necessary when strategy is formed.

Russia has two main options do deal with this situation. One is deterrence – i.e. trying to prevent these escalations and to seek a subsequent resolution of the conflict through a deal involving the total security architecture in Europe. The other option is to stop thinking about deals and to take proactive actions to neutralize the threat.

Due to the desperate and compulsive nature of the EU/NATO actions, the first option is not going to work. Any warnings, and deterrence in general, will be ignored – and compromises will be seen as weakness. A ceasefire will not be observed in the long term. A peace deal in Ukraine will not be observed. A deal on the total security framework in Europe will not be observed.

The narcissistic nature of the EU elites and their desperate situation has turned Europe into a rabid dog. You don’t negotiate with a rabid dog. Everybody knows how a rabid dog needs to be handled. Any ideas the Russians might still have about a long-term deal involving the EU are delusional.

This leaves proactive actions as the only realistic option. When planning such actions some groundwork is needed. The preparatory steps are the following:

The first step is to define the object of the actions. In this case it would probably be better to define the EU specifically as the object rather than the West as a whole, including the United States. The EU is a smaller target, and a more realistic one. This would mean that actions were specifically designed for the EU rather than for the West (or NATO) as a whole. This will significantly affect the choice of options.

The second step is to define an overall goal. That would be to neutralize the EU as a constant threat.

The third step is to probe the weaknesses of the EU. At the moment the EU has a lot of weaknesses, including economic, social, and competence related. The main weakness, however, is its cohesion problem. The EU is on the verge of fracturing and needs to be held together by force – as we saw earlier. The most effective proactive actions would be ones which would ‘overload’ the EU’s cohesion measures.

To describe this more clearly, the situation in the EU now resembles a siege. The EU center in Brussels has all of Europe under siege and takes immediate measures if someone tries to escape. Countries within the EU are under de facto economic sanctions from the EU itself, and are subject to hostile actions including regime change operations. Countries which might want to leave the EU simply can’t because they are locked inside.

Russia should seek to break that siege – enabling nature to take its course – which would be the fracturing of the EU.

The only realistic way to break Brussels’s siege of Europe is to provide an alternative to EU countries. That can only be done through ‘physical proximity.’ In other words, Russia needs to provide European countries with physical route out of the EU gulag. This can only be done by moving the Russian Army up to the EU borders and to occupy territory adjacent to them. The way things are developing this seems to be the only logical option.

This would require the Russian Army to seize south-western Ukraine, including Odessa, up to the Romanian and Moldovan borders. It might even require going farther north to the Hungarian border, depending on EU actions involving Romania. This would also secure control of the Danube – a critical trade route.

This action would be the equivalent of stabbing an awl through a plate of glass. It would be punctured, and fractures would form. Countries in the south-eastern part of the EU would be provided with a choice – including the one of joining the BRICS.

While other measures could be taken to pressure the EU, this would be the only obvious way to deliver a major blow to the integrity of the EU. The other option is just to wait it out and allow it to disintegrate on its own. That might take time and no one likes being constantly bitten by a rabid dog that just won’t die.

This option is going to be costly for Russia, partly because it would require going through the EU forces in the area. It is, however, probably going to be necessary.

---------------

Many thanks to my readers and followers! Special thanks to those who support me by visiting my tip jar. Your support is greatly appreciated!