I just want to point out that Russia controlling Odessa will not deprive the EU of access to the Black Sea . Bulgaria and Romania are members ; even if they are increasingly unhappy at that position .
Very true. I was mostly referring to the inland EU access through the Danube. But, as you say, it's doubtful that Bulgaria and Romania will remain EU members anyway, especially if this happens.
You didn't mention the use of ultra-violent muslims "immigrants" in order to attack and demoralizes the population, especially in Germany and the UK. I think theres a possibilty that Islam takes over a significant chunk of the EU.
Personally, I hope it gets so bad that even the billionaire elites and the royal family oligarchs are wiped away by the third-world crime and dystopian nihilism, then whats left of the native population can start all over again.
An excellent post. Guided me into thinking about a few things I had not previously considered.
As a US citizen, I must reluctantly admit that the US had a leading role in lots of this monkey business involving regime change, and we've been at it for a long time. Hopefully what is going on right now with things like USAID can chop that off at the knees for at least awhile.
The US hasn't really "won" a war for a long time, but is very good at simply doing the Homer Simpson "fade into the bushes" routine when they realize they have lost and it is time to go home. The EU apparently hasn't learned this trick yet.
To end on an optimistic note, I would suggest that perhaps the US in particular and most of the Rest of the World in a more general sense have actually gained something from the Ukraine debacle. Perhaps this adventure has finally reached that threshold of humiliation for the losers in the US neocon establishment, and their noses have finally been bloodied enough that they fall from influence. It's a shame that it cost so many lives to make it happen.
Curious how everyone writing about the future of the EU seems to leave the influence of Islam out of their scope. And yet I believe this is the most profound influence within Europe at this moment. They are many, they have utter disdain for "original" European culture and they do not eschew violence to make their point. Give it a few more years and Europe will have sharia law. In fact, the seer Baba Vanga predicted that in 2043, the caliphate will be called from Rome.
Very interesting analysis, thank you! One observation: Russia recently stated that it has no objection to the entrance of Ukraine in the EU. That fact is not really compatible with your analysis. The Russian view on the EU membership of the Ukraine is neither easy to comprehend, given that the EU is an anti Russia warmongering entity. Do you have an explanation?
Good question and I can only speculate because it's difficult to figure out what the Russians are thinking. Firstly I think the Russians have increasingly seen the EU and NATO as the same entity - since they kind of are. Therefore it would make sense to oppose EU membership for Ukraine. This might change now as NATO and the EU seem to be breaking up. Letting them into the EU will therefore be less of a security threat.
Secondly, it depends on what kind of Ukraine we're talking about - and the Russians may have a particular slice of Ukraine in mind when talking about Ukraine and the EU. If they are thinking about the western or north-western part plus some of the central-north, then absorbing that would be a poison pill for the EU - particularly the western part. The EU would be absorbing an entity which is totally bankrupt, socially broken, and full of neo-nazis who feel they've been betrayed. Angry nazis is not a group you want within your borders.
Western Ukraine also has an additional poison pill in the forms of the regions taken from Hungary and Romania back in the day - and actually from Poland too. These regions might want to go back to their motherlands and the motherlands will probably want them back. This might cause conflicts between EU states which will put a lot of strain on the forced unity of the EU.
I suspect that the Russians would see the EU membership of this part of Ukraine as suicidal for the EU and they will therefore support it - as long as NATO is safely off the table.
But this is just speculation. I don't really know.
As long as we believe we need to 'elect' political fraudsters to re-present us as compliant corporate 'dead' bodies, we will ever be kept in confusion and falsity.
Living ''in the private'' v submitting ''in the public''
EVERY natural man and woman is born “in the private”. Whereas the State is public, and therefore its Public Servants, and its legal fiction creations are “in the public”, including its artificial legal “persons”.
A man or woman can either “live” “in the private”, or “act” “in the public”. However ...
We are trained from an early age to accept a higher authority as normal. Most people exist in a culture of submission and conformity, allowing numerous aspects of their lives to be controlled by the Government. The populace is manipulated to become dependent (debt-money), and conditioned to become fearful (racism, terrorism, and wars). The manner and appearance of “authority” is usually intimidating by design, while the language of legal fiction commerce (Legalese) is deceptive.
You are indoctrinated to “act” in the “role” of an artificial legal “person”, which is a creation of the State and a debtor serving as “surety” for the corporate debt of YOURNATION (INC.).
Every nation with a Central Bank under the Bank for International Settlements has been indebted by the “incorporation” of its government into the debt-money system, thereby surrendering its power of sovereign money issuance.
A global system of debt-bondage has been established by “incorporating” governments,
and by programming the people to “act” in the fictional “roles” of “artificial persons”,
which as legal fictions having no innate productive capacity, are debtors by default,
serving as “transmitting utilities” for human energy.
An artificial legal “person” is a dead entity. It is a legal fiction “persona” in the “theatre of commerce”, and it is under the foreign Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction, the international “Law of the Sea”. On the contrary, you are born into your own sovereign Estate of body, mind, and soul. As a sentient man or woman you live within the sovereign Common Law Jurisdiction, the national “Law of the Land”.
The “Common Law” follows “Natural Law”, a living system of “right or justice” held to be common to all humans and derived from Nature rather than from the rules of society. In “Natural Law”, all people are born equal and endowed with unalienable rights.
Your sovereign jurisdiction, including your inborn Unalienable Rights, cannot be taken from you without your fully informed and willing consent.
Legal “person” “actors” for incorporated governments, banks, and all corporate entities, need to contract with other legal “person” “actors” to extract their “commercial energy”.
These legal “actors” make the PRESUMPTION that you are also “acting” in the “role” of a legal “person” in “legal fiction” commerce, which is why they are seeking a contract “performance”. They ALWAYS want the NAME and often the creation date of the legal “person” to establish “joinder”, forming an “adhesion contract”. They NEED A “PERSON”, because there is absolutely no way they can contract directly with a living man or woman. They need a man or woman to CONSENT TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY IN THE MATTER OF THE “PERSON”, unknowingly or knowingly, which is JOINDER.
In this way, a man or woman becomes party to the action involving the “person”, which is “joinder” of the parties into a single case in legal fiction commerce.
When a living name is “mirrored” by the registration of an artificial legal “person” on the Birth Certificate, an Estate Trust is formed, such as MR JOHN DOE TRUST. Any living man or woman unknowingly in JOINDER to such a legal fiction NAME blindly takes responsibility for the alleged debts of the Trust as its Trustee. Whereas an aware living man or woman can separate themselves from the legal fiction NAME and become the rightful controlling Agent, Beneficiary, Executor/Executrix for MR JOHN DOE TRUST.
Legal “actors” will attempt to engage the “person” by posting letters, by phone, or on the highway, to make and enforce a contract. Misrepresenting a living man or woman as a fictional “person” causing unwitting “joinder” is the crime of “personage”, and it is perpetuated by “barratry”, the crime of bringing false claims in court.
Private: To be “in the private” is to “live” in a “private capacity” as a Man or Woman, with flesh and blood, arms and legs, a conscious mind, a spirit, and Life. All Men and Women are created as equal Sovereigns, endowed with Unalienable Rights and Properties, including Credit equating to their valuable human energy. As natural Men and Women, they are Creditors, because they are born naturally with innate productive capacities. Their right to contract is Unlimited, and they have unlimited liability, being responsible adults. They are outside and above the State. From Latin privatus “set apart, belonging to oneself (not to the state)”.
Public: To be “in the public” is to “act” in a “public capacity” as an “accommodation party” in “joinder” to an “artificial person” created and governed by the State. All Men and Women who “act” in legal fiction “roles” for the State are granted revocable Privileges and Benefits prescribed in legislative “Acts”. As Artificial Persons, they are Debtors, because they are created legally without innate productive capacities. Their right to contract is Limited, and they have limited liability, being legally incompetent “creatures of the State”, its legal children. They are inside and under the State. From Latin publicus “of the people; of the state; done for the state”.
In proper grammar, living "Given names" are proper nouns beginning with a capital letter, and if a “Family name” is added it is separated by a colon indicating the facts and introducing their relationship. But fictional “persons” are not styled in this grammatically correct manner.
Note the types of “persons” evidenced by the following styles:
John Henry Doe = Foreign Situs Trust
JOHN HENRY DOE = Cestui Que Vie ESTATE Trust
JOHN H. DOE = Public Transmitting Utility
A man or woman in “joinder” to a “person” becomes the “walking dead”, legally speaking. By definition, they are incompetent and incapable of possessing living rights and responsibilities. Consequently, their Estate Title properties are forfeit, and they are granted limited and revocable benefits and privileges. Their “ignorance is negligence”, and for as long as they walk in the underworld of the legally dead, they are subject to the “High Priests of Ba'al”, or the “Black Robed Devil”, who makes a “judgement” upon the one who has given up their life, and in so doing the Priest delivers a curse, in ancient times death, in modern times debt, and the victim is sacrificed.
Every “person” is a debtor by default, and every man or woman who suffers “joinder” to a “person” becomes “surety” in the debt-money system of bondage, sacrificing their living energy via that fictional “transmitting utility”, feeding the parasitic banking cabal which espouses the Roman motto: “He who would be deceived, let him be deceived.”
Maxims of Law
Consensus facit legem. Consent makes the law. A contract is a law between the parties, which can acquire force only by consent.
Qui tacet consentire videtur. A party who is silent appears to consent.
Non videntur qui errant consentire. He who errs is not considered as consenting.
Disparata non debent jungi. Unequal things ought not to be joined.
Maxims of Law
Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat. The burden of the proof lies upon him who affirms, not he who denies.
Incerta pro nullis habentur. Things uncertain are considered as nothing.
Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. False in one thing, false in everything.
Quaelibet jurisdictio cancellos suos habet. Every jurisdiction has its boundaries.
These are the globalist buffoons who believe that "we are One." We are never , ever "ONE" We are many and we live in the glory of "Many" They believe that they and only they know what we should do.. Seems like the book "1984" to me.. They are a disgraceful bunch of self absorbed miscreants that only seek to dominate us. It is time to stand up and say " We are not going to take it anymore."
Is narcissism evil, and if so, has the EU become an evil entity because of its collective narcissism described above?
Given good and evil are semantically confounded and overdetermined, to answer this question we must define good and evil objectively with respect to the one-many dialectic.
In the context of the one-many dialectic, an entity may elevate the status of another entity to infinity and the status of themselves to zero via a life sacrificing altruism. We may define this extreme pole of the one-many dialetic as good.
Conversely, an entity may elevate the status of an other to entity to zero and the status of themselves to infinity by treating that entity merely as a means to its own end. We may define this extreme pole of the one-many dialectic as evil.
That's the thing about Oligarchs, they are a slippery, shape-shifting amalgam of the greediest, most self-centred and arrogant humans. They will use any tactic, strategy or deception to gain and hold power/influence. Remaining unrecognized for the role they play is essential, otherwise to apocryphally quote Napoleon, "the masses would murder us in our sleep".
“Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority; still more when you superadd the tendency of the certainty of corruption by authority.”
Like Tweedle Dum and Dee, the US-centric Oligarchs are trying to wrest control of the WEF Great Reset (remnants of?) from the European-centric Oligarchs. In short, there's a reason why Mrs Adelson "loaned" $100million to Trump for his campaign. To secure his public allegiance and signal to AIPAC that the Rothschild Cabal will not be allowed to do in the US what they did in Canada and the EU... "penetrate" (to directly quote Schwab) the gov'ts. Examples include Macron (ex-Rothschild banker) and Merkel (WEF Young Leader 1992). Bear in mind Hillary Clinton and Lynn de Rothschild are documented in their own emails as more than just acquaintances, the teaser being Clinton invited the Rothschilds to honeymoon at the White House.
Yup, lil' old Canada, where J. Trudeau (also Young Leaders 1992), J. Singh (Young Leaders 200?, reference removed from WEF site), Freeland (long-time Soros and Rothschild protege), and last but not least, Carney (WEF Board and Steering Committee for Lynn de Rothschild's Council for Inclusive Capitalism).
The Rothschilds have been at this 'project' at least since they loaned too much money to both the Brit and French aristocracy for the Napoleonic Wars. And also loaned Disraeli 'off book' enough to buy the majority share of the Suez Canal... and the Brits STILL want that back. The Rothschilds ended up controlling both central banks, and still control the Bof England... ya, that Carney guy pops up again.
keeping the Oligarchs in view, it becomes really simple to suss out what the supposed US vs. EU kerfuffles over Ukraine and Palestine are really about.
I think it's important to make a distinction between European common folk and its political leadership when it comes to identifying the real villains in this story. Native Europeans are victims of the corrupt and destructive practices of their notional politicians, who only have loyalty to the WEF and Globalist Autocracy. Their nations are being destroyed via demographic replacement, which is being implemented by treasonous power-players and simultaneously being impoverished via deindustrialization and endless sovereign borrowing. And they are not going to vote themselves out of the mess they're in. Nothing will change until the environment changes. Only a bout of extreme hardship and deprivation can shake them out of their malaise and start a rising with which to purge the parasitic infection that is not killing them in slow motion. And there is no cavalry coming over the hill to save them. They must rise soon or there will be nothing left to save.
I agree with all your points. The European people are basically victims of decades-long mind control who live in an artificial environment. Also and unfortunately, I think you're right that they won't wake up until things get bad enough to seriously affect them personally. At that point, they will be told that someone else than the culprits is to blame so who knows what they'll do.
Still, my opinion is that people are responsible for their own actions and for their own ignorance. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse for a crime. But applying that opinion to the people of Europe is perhaps more a reflection of my bitterness than a realistic view.
Strangely, the model of "vicious, unappealing midwits with impunity" has failed to resonate around the world.
Instead it has manufactured enemies, radicalizing them one target at a time. As, indeed, it has domestically. Eventually, these kinds of people bother the equivalent of Mel Gibson's character - like gamers. Or they go big, like Russia. And they keep stacking enemies, until the decision is no longer how to cohabit with them but how to break them.
It's the core nature of the modern Left, aligned as it is from Davos. As they slip further, they're going to show us even more categorically why breaking them is a civilizational imperative.
Fantastic Essay!!
Very good essay .
I just want to point out that Russia controlling Odessa will not deprive the EU of access to the Black Sea . Bulgaria and Romania are members ; even if they are increasingly unhappy at that position .
Very true. I was mostly referring to the inland EU access through the Danube. But, as you say, it's doubtful that Bulgaria and Romania will remain EU members anyway, especially if this happens.
You didn't mention the use of ultra-violent muslims "immigrants" in order to attack and demoralizes the population, especially in Germany and the UK. I think theres a possibilty that Islam takes over a significant chunk of the EU.
Personally, I hope it gets so bad that even the billionaire elites and the royal family oligarchs are wiped away by the third-world crime and dystopian nihilism, then whats left of the native population can start all over again.
An excellent post. Guided me into thinking about a few things I had not previously considered.
As a US citizen, I must reluctantly admit that the US had a leading role in lots of this monkey business involving regime change, and we've been at it for a long time. Hopefully what is going on right now with things like USAID can chop that off at the knees for at least awhile.
The US hasn't really "won" a war for a long time, but is very good at simply doing the Homer Simpson "fade into the bushes" routine when they realize they have lost and it is time to go home. The EU apparently hasn't learned this trick yet.
To end on an optimistic note, I would suggest that perhaps the US in particular and most of the Rest of the World in a more general sense have actually gained something from the Ukraine debacle. Perhaps this adventure has finally reached that threshold of humiliation for the losers in the US neocon establishment, and their noses have finally been bloodied enough that they fall from influence. It's a shame that it cost so many lives to make it happen.
What a splendid essay - a real gift.
But WHO are the ones constituting this "Transatlantic Cabal"?
Is the room so big that the elephant cannot be seen?
They euphemistically get referred to as the Deep State, The Blob, the City of London, the Donor Class.
Or we could just refer to the names they call themselves: The Rothschilds, Adelsons, Soros', King Charles, Warburgs, Marburgs etc.
Curious how everyone writing about the future of the EU seems to leave the influence of Islam out of their scope. And yet I believe this is the most profound influence within Europe at this moment. They are many, they have utter disdain for "original" European culture and they do not eschew violence to make their point. Give it a few more years and Europe will have sharia law. In fact, the seer Baba Vanga predicted that in 2043, the caliphate will be called from Rome.
https://grasisgroen15.substack.com/p/europe-at-the-crossroads?r=1mxda8
And don't forget the people about whom one is not allowed to criticize.
But WHO are the ones constituting this "Transatlantic Cabal"?
Is the room so big that the elephant cannot be seen?
Very interesting analysis, thank you! One observation: Russia recently stated that it has no objection to the entrance of Ukraine in the EU. That fact is not really compatible with your analysis. The Russian view on the EU membership of the Ukraine is neither easy to comprehend, given that the EU is an anti Russia warmongering entity. Do you have an explanation?
Good question and I can only speculate because it's difficult to figure out what the Russians are thinking. Firstly I think the Russians have increasingly seen the EU and NATO as the same entity - since they kind of are. Therefore it would make sense to oppose EU membership for Ukraine. This might change now as NATO and the EU seem to be breaking up. Letting them into the EU will therefore be less of a security threat.
Secondly, it depends on what kind of Ukraine we're talking about - and the Russians may have a particular slice of Ukraine in mind when talking about Ukraine and the EU. If they are thinking about the western or north-western part plus some of the central-north, then absorbing that would be a poison pill for the EU - particularly the western part. The EU would be absorbing an entity which is totally bankrupt, socially broken, and full of neo-nazis who feel they've been betrayed. Angry nazis is not a group you want within your borders.
Western Ukraine also has an additional poison pill in the forms of the regions taken from Hungary and Romania back in the day - and actually from Poland too. These regions might want to go back to their motherlands and the motherlands will probably want them back. This might cause conflicts between EU states which will put a lot of strain on the forced unity of the EU.
I suspect that the Russians would see the EU membership of this part of Ukraine as suicidal for the EU and they will therefore support it - as long as NATO is safely off the table.
But this is just speculation. I don't really know.
Thank you, seems a reasonable explanation!
As long as we believe we need to 'elect' political fraudsters to re-present us as compliant corporate 'dead' bodies, we will ever be kept in confusion and falsity.
Living ''in the private'' v submitting ''in the public''
Courtesy of Michael-Rolf of https:lipforms.com
https://livingintheprivate.blogspot.com/p/home.html
EVERY natural man and woman is born “in the private”. Whereas the State is public, and therefore its Public Servants, and its legal fiction creations are “in the public”, including its artificial legal “persons”.
A man or woman can either “live” “in the private”, or “act” “in the public”. However ...
We are trained from an early age to accept a higher authority as normal. Most people exist in a culture of submission and conformity, allowing numerous aspects of their lives to be controlled by the Government. The populace is manipulated to become dependent (debt-money), and conditioned to become fearful (racism, terrorism, and wars). The manner and appearance of “authority” is usually intimidating by design, while the language of legal fiction commerce (Legalese) is deceptive.
You are indoctrinated to “act” in the “role” of an artificial legal “person”, which is a creation of the State and a debtor serving as “surety” for the corporate debt of YOURNATION (INC.).
Every nation with a Central Bank under the Bank for International Settlements has been indebted by the “incorporation” of its government into the debt-money system, thereby surrendering its power of sovereign money issuance.
A global system of debt-bondage has been established by “incorporating” governments,
and by programming the people to “act” in the fictional “roles” of “artificial persons”,
which as legal fictions having no innate productive capacity, are debtors by default,
serving as “transmitting utilities” for human energy.
An artificial legal “person” is a dead entity. It is a legal fiction “persona” in the “theatre of commerce”, and it is under the foreign Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction, the international “Law of the Sea”. On the contrary, you are born into your own sovereign Estate of body, mind, and soul. As a sentient man or woman you live within the sovereign Common Law Jurisdiction, the national “Law of the Land”.
The “Common Law” follows “Natural Law”, a living system of “right or justice” held to be common to all humans and derived from Nature rather than from the rules of society. In “Natural Law”, all people are born equal and endowed with unalienable rights.
Your sovereign jurisdiction, including your inborn Unalienable Rights, cannot be taken from you without your fully informed and willing consent.
Legal “person” “actors” for incorporated governments, banks, and all corporate entities, need to contract with other legal “person” “actors” to extract their “commercial energy”.
These legal “actors” make the PRESUMPTION that you are also “acting” in the “role” of a legal “person” in “legal fiction” commerce, which is why they are seeking a contract “performance”. They ALWAYS want the NAME and often the creation date of the legal “person” to establish “joinder”, forming an “adhesion contract”. They NEED A “PERSON”, because there is absolutely no way they can contract directly with a living man or woman. They need a man or woman to CONSENT TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY IN THE MATTER OF THE “PERSON”, unknowingly or knowingly, which is JOINDER.
In this way, a man or woman becomes party to the action involving the “person”, which is “joinder” of the parties into a single case in legal fiction commerce.
When a living name is “mirrored” by the registration of an artificial legal “person” on the Birth Certificate, an Estate Trust is formed, such as MR JOHN DOE TRUST. Any living man or woman unknowingly in JOINDER to such a legal fiction NAME blindly takes responsibility for the alleged debts of the Trust as its Trustee. Whereas an aware living man or woman can separate themselves from the legal fiction NAME and become the rightful controlling Agent, Beneficiary, Executor/Executrix for MR JOHN DOE TRUST.
Legal “actors” will attempt to engage the “person” by posting letters, by phone, or on the highway, to make and enforce a contract. Misrepresenting a living man or woman as a fictional “person” causing unwitting “joinder” is the crime of “personage”, and it is perpetuated by “barratry”, the crime of bringing false claims in court.
Private: To be “in the private” is to “live” in a “private capacity” as a Man or Woman, with flesh and blood, arms and legs, a conscious mind, a spirit, and Life. All Men and Women are created as equal Sovereigns, endowed with Unalienable Rights and Properties, including Credit equating to their valuable human energy. As natural Men and Women, they are Creditors, because they are born naturally with innate productive capacities. Their right to contract is Unlimited, and they have unlimited liability, being responsible adults. They are outside and above the State. From Latin privatus “set apart, belonging to oneself (not to the state)”.
Public: To be “in the public” is to “act” in a “public capacity” as an “accommodation party” in “joinder” to an “artificial person” created and governed by the State. All Men and Women who “act” in legal fiction “roles” for the State are granted revocable Privileges and Benefits prescribed in legislative “Acts”. As Artificial Persons, they are Debtors, because they are created legally without innate productive capacities. Their right to contract is Limited, and they have limited liability, being legally incompetent “creatures of the State”, its legal children. They are inside and under the State. From Latin publicus “of the people; of the state; done for the state”.
In proper grammar, living "Given names" are proper nouns beginning with a capital letter, and if a “Family name” is added it is separated by a colon indicating the facts and introducing their relationship. But fictional “persons” are not styled in this grammatically correct manner.
Note the types of “persons” evidenced by the following styles:
John Henry Doe = Foreign Situs Trust
JOHN HENRY DOE = Cestui Que Vie ESTATE Trust
JOHN H. DOE = Public Transmitting Utility
A man or woman in “joinder” to a “person” becomes the “walking dead”, legally speaking. By definition, they are incompetent and incapable of possessing living rights and responsibilities. Consequently, their Estate Title properties are forfeit, and they are granted limited and revocable benefits and privileges. Their “ignorance is negligence”, and for as long as they walk in the underworld of the legally dead, they are subject to the “High Priests of Ba'al”, or the “Black Robed Devil”, who makes a “judgement” upon the one who has given up their life, and in so doing the Priest delivers a curse, in ancient times death, in modern times debt, and the victim is sacrificed.
Every “person” is a debtor by default, and every man or woman who suffers “joinder” to a “person” becomes “surety” in the debt-money system of bondage, sacrificing their living energy via that fictional “transmitting utility”, feeding the parasitic banking cabal which espouses the Roman motto: “He who would be deceived, let him be deceived.”
Maxims of Law
Consensus facit legem. Consent makes the law. A contract is a law between the parties, which can acquire force only by consent.
Qui tacet consentire videtur. A party who is silent appears to consent.
Non videntur qui errant consentire. He who errs is not considered as consenting.
Disparata non debent jungi. Unequal things ought not to be joined.
Maxims of Law
Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat. The burden of the proof lies upon him who affirms, not he who denies.
Incerta pro nullis habentur. Things uncertain are considered as nothing.
Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. False in one thing, false in everything.
Quaelibet jurisdictio cancellos suos habet. Every jurisdiction has its boundaries.
These are the globalist buffoons who believe that "we are One." We are never , ever "ONE" We are many and we live in the glory of "Many" They believe that they and only they know what we should do.. Seems like the book "1984" to me.. They are a disgraceful bunch of self absorbed miscreants that only seek to dominate us. It is time to stand up and say " We are not going to take it anymore."
Respectfully.
Is narcissism evil, and if so, has the EU become an evil entity because of its collective narcissism described above?
Given good and evil are semantically confounded and overdetermined, to answer this question we must define good and evil objectively with respect to the one-many dialectic.
In the context of the one-many dialectic, an entity may elevate the status of another entity to infinity and the status of themselves to zero via a life sacrificing altruism. We may define this extreme pole of the one-many dialetic as good.
Conversely, an entity may elevate the status of an other to entity to zero and the status of themselves to infinity by treating that entity merely as a means to its own end. We may define this extreme pole of the one-many dialectic as evil.
(Edited: spelling and grammar)
That's the thing about Oligarchs, they are a slippery, shape-shifting amalgam of the greediest, most self-centred and arrogant humans. They will use any tactic, strategy or deception to gain and hold power/influence. Remaining unrecognized for the role they play is essential, otherwise to apocryphally quote Napoleon, "the masses would murder us in our sleep".
“Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority; still more when you superadd the tendency of the certainty of corruption by authority.”
https://www.acton.org/research/lord-acton-quote-archive
Like Tweedle Dum and Dee, the US-centric Oligarchs are trying to wrest control of the WEF Great Reset (remnants of?) from the European-centric Oligarchs. In short, there's a reason why Mrs Adelson "loaned" $100million to Trump for his campaign. To secure his public allegiance and signal to AIPAC that the Rothschild Cabal will not be allowed to do in the US what they did in Canada and the EU... "penetrate" (to directly quote Schwab) the gov'ts. Examples include Macron (ex-Rothschild banker) and Merkel (WEF Young Leader 1992). Bear in mind Hillary Clinton and Lynn de Rothschild are documented in their own emails as more than just acquaintances, the teaser being Clinton invited the Rothschilds to honeymoon at the White House.
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/?q=rothschild%7Crothschilds
Yup, lil' old Canada, where J. Trudeau (also Young Leaders 1992), J. Singh (Young Leaders 200?, reference removed from WEF site), Freeland (long-time Soros and Rothschild protege), and last but not least, Carney (WEF Board and Steering Committee for Lynn de Rothschild's Council for Inclusive Capitalism).
The Rothschilds have been at this 'project' at least since they loaned too much money to both the Brit and French aristocracy for the Napoleonic Wars. And also loaned Disraeli 'off book' enough to buy the majority share of the Suez Canal... and the Brits STILL want that back. The Rothschilds ended up controlling both central banks, and still control the Bof England... ya, that Carney guy pops up again.
keeping the Oligarchs in view, it becomes really simple to suss out what the supposed US vs. EU kerfuffles over Ukraine and Palestine are really about.
Absolute Power... ergo, absolute corruption.
Simply fantastic! Superb description of the state of affairs in the West & EU!
Quote: "Europe is the center of the world – if not the Universe."
Europe is the "garden"... all else is the "jungle"
Quote: "the EU system is systemic corruption" Exactly!
Quote: "They perceive the Chinese as thieving and untrustworthy, the Russians as subhuman animals"
You may be underestimating the power of mass psychology manipulation
Quote: "Brussels is so powerful that if it writes a law, even one that benefits Europe at the cost of others, the world will be compelled to obey."
Ask him, how is the weather in La La land?
Quotes: "moral superiority", "Clint Eastwood walking into a gay club" "diaper fetish is a part of that lifestyle"
lol lol hilarious :-)
I think it's important to make a distinction between European common folk and its political leadership when it comes to identifying the real villains in this story. Native Europeans are victims of the corrupt and destructive practices of their notional politicians, who only have loyalty to the WEF and Globalist Autocracy. Their nations are being destroyed via demographic replacement, which is being implemented by treasonous power-players and simultaneously being impoverished via deindustrialization and endless sovereign borrowing. And they are not going to vote themselves out of the mess they're in. Nothing will change until the environment changes. Only a bout of extreme hardship and deprivation can shake them out of their malaise and start a rising with which to purge the parasitic infection that is not killing them in slow motion. And there is no cavalry coming over the hill to save them. They must rise soon or there will be nothing left to save.
I agree with all your points. The European people are basically victims of decades-long mind control who live in an artificial environment. Also and unfortunately, I think you're right that they won't wake up until things get bad enough to seriously affect them personally. At that point, they will be told that someone else than the culprits is to blame so who knows what they'll do.
Still, my opinion is that people are responsible for their own actions and for their own ignorance. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse for a crime. But applying that opinion to the people of Europe is perhaps more a reflection of my bitterness than a realistic view.
Strangely, the model of "vicious, unappealing midwits with impunity" has failed to resonate around the world.
Instead it has manufactured enemies, radicalizing them one target at a time. As, indeed, it has domestically. Eventually, these kinds of people bother the equivalent of Mel Gibson's character - like gamers. Or they go big, like Russia. And they keep stacking enemies, until the decision is no longer how to cohabit with them but how to break them.
It's the core nature of the modern Left, aligned as it is from Davos. As they slip further, they're going to show us even more categorically why breaking them is a civilizational imperative.